80% Disabled Employment Target

Criticism of Government’s Over Ambitious Employment Targets

Labour MP Tom Hayes has raised pressing questions about the UK government's commitment to closing the disability employment gap by 2030.

On Monday, Hayes asked the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions whether closing this gap would become an official policy goal.

Alison McGovern, the Minister of State responded by highlighting the government’s ambitious plans.

She pointed to upcoming legislative efforts, including a White Paper, the Employment Rights Bill, and the Equality (Race and Disability) Bill, as part of a broader strategy to create a more inclusive labour market.

Despite these assurances, skepticism remains about the feasibility of achieving an 80% employment rate by 2030, particularly for disabled individuals, given that currently (September 2024) it stands at 52%

Critics argue that while the government’s intentions are commendable, substantial structural changes will be required to meet these goals.

The current employment gap is significant, and narrowing it will require not just legislation but also considerable investment in accessible workplaces, comprehensive support systems, and employer incentives.

Past efforts have shown that without robust, actionable plans and consistent follow-through, such targets risk becoming mere political rhetoric.

The Buckland Review of Autism Employment published earlier this year, highlights promoting internships and apprenticeships as pathways for autistic individuals to gain work experience and develop essential skills. (Link at bottom of the page)

However, there is a growing concern that these programs could be exploited by some employers, effectively using autistic individuals as a source of free or low-cost labour. This potential for exploitation underscores the urgent need for government intervention to establish robust protections for participants.

Without adequate safeguards, the risk is that these well-intentioned programs may inadvertently contribute to unfair labour practices, where autistic individuals are not provided with meaningful career advancement opportunities.

To prevent this, it is crucial that the government enforces clear guidelines and monitoring systems, ensuring that internships and apprenticeships are genuinely beneficial, equitable, and lead to sustainable employment.

Protecting the rights and interests of autistic individuals must be a priority to prevent any form of exploitation under the guise of skill development.

As the government prepares to unveil its detailed plans, employers and disabled people across all sectors are keenly awaiting concrete measures that will substantiate these ambitious promises.

The challenge remains formidable, and the coming years will be critical in determining whether the government can turn its vision into reality.

Buckland Review 2024

Comments

Farage's Cruelty-Autism

Farage's Cruelty & Misinformation on Autism: A Call for Compassion and Truth in Autism Awareness Month - by Mark Webster, Disability Officer with The Green Party Telford and Wrekin As Autism Awareness and Acceptance Month 2025 draws to a close, the need for understanding, compassion, and factual discussion about autism and the SEND (Special Educational Needs and Disabilities) system has never been more urgent. Yet, Nigel Farage and Reform UK have chosen this crucial moment to spread harmful and inaccurate narratives about autism diagnosis, compounding stigma and misunderstanding for autistic people and their families across the UK. SEND (Special Educational Needs and Disabilities) is a blanket term that refers to conditions or difficulties that make it hard for a person to learn or access education compared to others, such as learning disabilities, physical disabilities, or emotional and behavioral challenges. Farage’s Harmful Claims In a series of recent statemen...

Davies:Missing Inaction

Shaun Davies and Labour’s Water Woes: A Tale of Empty Promises and Missed Votes Let’s talk about Shaun Davies, the Labour MP for Telford, who proudly claims to be “Standing Up for Telford.” Well, on the 28th of January 2025, he was notably *not* standing up for Telford—or anyone else, for that matter—when it came to voting on the Water (Special Measures) Bill. In fact, he didn’t show up at all. And he wasn’t alone. Many of his Labour colleagues also failed to turn up, leaving critical amendments to the bill hanging in the balance. So much for standing up for clean water and environmental accountability. The Water (Special Measures) Bill wasn’t just another piece of legislation. It was a chance to address the UK’s ongoing water crisis—a crisis that has seen rivers polluted, habitats destroyed, and water companies raking in profits while customers foot the bill for their failures. The amendments proposed were not just sensible; they were necessary. One key amendment would have ensured th...

Hidden Cost of Caring

Hidden Costs Why Our Family Carers Deserve Better Imagine waking up every day knowing that your entire world revolves around caring for a loved one with disabilities. You’re doing everything you can to keep them safe, comfortable, and loved — often at great personal cost. Now, consider this: nearly half of parent carers in the UK say their income doesn’t even cover basic needs like food and housing. That’s almost 44%. And if your fridge breaks or your bed falls apart? Over 80% of carers say they couldn’t replace essentials without going into debt or going without. It’s heartbreaking, isn’t it? And yet, these are the everyday realities for millions of families. Many are skipping meals just to make sure their children eat, with over half of parent carers doing so. Meanwhile, a staggering 93% of families want to work paid jobs, but caring responsibilities make that practically impossible. The emotional toll is equally heavy, with 28% of parent carers likely to be clinically dep...

Mark That Disabled Green Party Guy

Search This Blog