Assisted Suicide Committee Update 2

Committee Urged to Reconsider Legalising Assisted Suicide Due to Serious Concerns

In what many have seen as a significant oversight—and an attempt to sideline disabled voices—Labour MP Kim Leadbetter failed to involve ANY disabled individuals, groups, or organisations in providing evidence to the committee on assisted dying. This decision sparked widespread criticism, particularly from disabled people’s organisations (DPOs), including myself. Following the backlash, a single invitation was extended to Disability Rights UK (DRUK) to contribute.

The proposed bill, as it stands, has the potential to cause serious and far-reaching harm, particularly in a society where inequality and ableism are deeply ingrained. The committee was warned that the bill could have profound implications for how society, including doctors and health authorities, perceives the value of disabled lives.

One key point raised was:

“We already face an uphill battle convincing people that our lives are of equal worth. This bill doesn’t help it actively undermines that goal.”

The committee were told many disabled individuals have encountered dismissive attitudes from NHS staff, (and I include myself here), we are sometimes treated as though our lives are less valuable simply because our conditions can’t be “cured.”

This resonated deeply with my own experiences in Shropshire, whether at my GP in Telford or at hospitals like the Royal Shrewsbury and the Princess Royal in Telford.

The committee also heard disturbing accounts from the COVID-19 pandemic, where disabled people were often treated as expendable. Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) orders were added to medical notes without consent, reflecting a troubling disregard for disabled lives. These stories underscored fears that giving doctors the power to guide disabled individuals toward assisted dying could further endanger a group that already faces systemic discrimination.

Another critical issue raised was the lack of a clear plan for adult social care. The Labour government has delayed publishing its strategy until 2028, leaving significant uncertainty about future structures and funding. Passing this bill without addressing these gaps would be like putting the cart before the horse—risking lives unnecessarily.

As of the end of January 2025, there’s simply too much work to be done to make this bill fit for purpose. Without a clear understanding of palliative and end-of-life care structures and funding—details that won’t be available until after 2028—the bill in its current form should be scrapped. It’s essential to revisit this issue once we have a clearer picture of how to support vulnerable individuals properly.

Mark Webster

Disability Officer

The Green Party

Telford and Wrekin

Comments

Farage's Cruelty-Autism

Farage's Cruelty & Misinformation on Autism: A Call for Compassion and Truth in Autism Awareness Month - by Mark Webster, Disability Officer with The Green Party Telford and Wrekin As Autism Awareness and Acceptance Month 2025 draws to a close, the need for understanding, compassion, and factual discussion about autism and the SEND (Special Educational Needs and Disabilities) system has never been more urgent. Yet, Nigel Farage and Reform UK have chosen this crucial moment to spread harmful and inaccurate narratives about autism diagnosis, compounding stigma and misunderstanding for autistic people and their families across the UK. SEND (Special Educational Needs and Disabilities) is a blanket term that refers to conditions or difficulties that make it hard for a person to learn or access education compared to others, such as learning disabilities, physical disabilities, or emotional and behavioral challenges. Farage’s Harmful Claims In a series of recent statemen...

Davies:Missing Inaction

Shaun Davies and Labour’s Water Woes: A Tale of Empty Promises and Missed Votes Let’s talk about Shaun Davies, the Labour MP for Telford, who proudly claims to be “Standing Up for Telford.” Well, on the 28th of January 2025, he was notably *not* standing up for Telford—or anyone else, for that matter—when it came to voting on the Water (Special Measures) Bill. In fact, he didn’t show up at all. And he wasn’t alone. Many of his Labour colleagues also failed to turn up, leaving critical amendments to the bill hanging in the balance. So much for standing up for clean water and environmental accountability. The Water (Special Measures) Bill wasn’t just another piece of legislation. It was a chance to address the UK’s ongoing water crisis—a crisis that has seen rivers polluted, habitats destroyed, and water companies raking in profits while customers foot the bill for their failures. The amendments proposed were not just sensible; they were necessary. One key amendment would have ensured th...

Hidden Cost of Caring

Hidden Costs Why Our Family Carers Deserve Better Imagine waking up every day knowing that your entire world revolves around caring for a loved one with disabilities. You’re doing everything you can to keep them safe, comfortable, and loved — often at great personal cost. Now, consider this: nearly half of parent carers in the UK say their income doesn’t even cover basic needs like food and housing. That’s almost 44%. And if your fridge breaks or your bed falls apart? Over 80% of carers say they couldn’t replace essentials without going into debt or going without. It’s heartbreaking, isn’t it? And yet, these are the everyday realities for millions of families. Many are skipping meals just to make sure their children eat, with over half of parent carers doing so. Meanwhile, a staggering 93% of families want to work paid jobs, but caring responsibilities make that practically impossible. The emotional toll is equally heavy, with 28% of parent carers likely to be clinically dep...

Mark That Disabled Green Party Guy

Search This Blog