Skip to main content

Assisted Dying Bill - Committee Stage Concluded

Assisted Dying Bill - Committee Stage Concluded 

Today, we're diving into a topic that's both deeply personal and widely debated: the Assisted Dying Bill, officially known as the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill. This bill has recently completed its committee stage and is heading back to the House of Commons for further discussion on April 25, 2025.

The committee sat last Wednesday, the same day as the contentious Spring Statement by the Chancellor Rachel Reeves.

As a consequence, the committees final sitting was hugely under reported given its significance and importance. There has been talk among the disabled community, many of who are against the bill, (although not the principle -Ed) that the committee was scheduled on purpose so that it's final session would fly under the radar. Is this in the realm of conspiracy theory, or could there be a grain of truth in there?

As we explore this topic, I'll admit upfront that I have some reservations about the bill due to its potential negative implications. However, I'll do my best to provide a balanced view of its contents and the surrounding debates.


What’s Now in the Bill?

The Assisted Dying Bill addresses the needs of terminally ill adults who wish to end their life with medical assistance. Here’s a breakdown of the key amendments and points:


Key Amendments

Eligibility Criteria: The bill specifies who can request assistance, focusing on terminally ill adults meeting certain age, residency, and medical registration conditions.

Capacity: It defines “capacity” in line with the Mental Capacity Act 2005, ensuring that individuals are mentally capable of making such a decision.

Role of the Voluntary Assisted Dying Commissioner: A new role is introduced to oversee and ensure the legality and ethics of the process.

Preliminary Discussions and Assessment Procedures: Sets guidelines for initial conversations and assessments by coordinating and independent doctors.

Safeguards and Protections: Ensures that individuals make informed decisions free from coercion.

Review Panels and Documentation: Establishes panels for reviewing eligibility and mandates thorough documentation.

Protections for Health Professionals: Offers legal protection for those who choose not to participate in the process.


Contentious Points

While the bill aims to provide a dignified option for terminally ill individuals, several contentious points have sparked debate:

Definition of Terminal Illness: 

The six-month prognosis requirement can be tricky, as predicting life expectancy is complex and varies by condition.

Capacity Assessments: Determining mental capacity, especially with mental health issues, can be contentious.

Role of Medical Professionals: 

Ethical dilemmas arise when personal beliefs conflict with professional duties.

Coercion and Pressure: Ensuring freedom from coercion, especially in familial or financial contexts, is crucial.

Impact on Vulnerable Populations: 

Concerns persist about how this might disproportionately affect vulnerable groups.


Public Opinion

Public sentiment on assisted dying is shifting. Recent polls from March 2025 show 59% of Britons support assisted dying for incurable conditions, and 79% for terminally ill patients. Historically, support has hovered around 66% to 70%, indicating strong and consistent backing.


Legislative Context

This bill emerges amidst evolving legislative proposals, like the Leadbeater Bill, and growing public support could significantly influence future debates and decisions.

While I have my reservations about the potential risks and ethical dilemmas, it's clear that the Assisted Dying Bill is a significant step in addressing the desires of those facing terminal illness. It’s crucial that we continue to engage in thoughtful discussion, considering both the compassionate intentions and the complex ethical implications. Let’s keep this conversation going, as it impacts us all in profound ways, and watch what happens in parliament towards the end of April.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Wolf in Reformist Clothing

A Wolf in Reformist Clothing: Dissecting the Structural Ableism of Reform UK's SEND "Vision" As a Green Party Disability Officer with three decades of experience, and as a parent who has spent 15 years battling intransigent local authorities for my neurodivergent son, and others, I watched Richard Tice’s press statement with a familiar, corrosive fury. This is not a blueprint for reform. It is a masterclass in the very structural ableism and neoliberal betrayal that has manufactured the SEND crisis. So come with me, and let’s dissect it with the critical eye that it demands. The Insidious Linguistics of Erasure Tice with his core creed: “Nobody's disabled, people are differently abled.” This phrase is not progressive; it is erasure. It is a feel-good, ablest euphemism designed to sanitise the reality of disability in a society structured against us. Disability is not a matter of “different ability”; it is an interaction between impairment and t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Farage's Cruelty-Autism

Farage's Cruelty & Misinformation on Autism: A Call for Compassion and Truth in Autism Awareness Month - by Mark Webster, Disability Officer with The Green Party Telford and Wrekin  As Autism Awareness and Acceptance Month 2025 draws to a close,  the need for understanding, compassion, and factual discussion about autism and the SEND (Special Educational Needs and Disabilities) system has never been more urgent. Yet, Nigel Farage and Reform UK have chosen this crucial moment to spread harmful and inaccurate narratives about autism diagnosis, compounding stigma and misunderstanding for autistic people and their families across the UK. SEND (Special Educational Needs and Disabilities) is a blanket term that refers to conditions or difficulties that make it hard for a person to learn or access education compared to others, such as learning disabilities, physical disabilities, or emotional and behavioral challenges.  Farage’s Harmful Claims In a series of recent statemen...
Post a Comment
Read more

LibDem Conference 2025

Following last week's observations of the Reform UK Ltd conference, I had hoped that there would be nothing to report from the Liberal Democrats conference as far as disability is concerned. How wrong was I? While at the conference their leader, Sir Ed Davey, stocked the fires of the hostile environment towards the sick and disabled, using tired old tropes and unsupported figures! See video For istance, Sir Ed, sounding very right wing himself, regurgitated the "fact" that there is widespread fraud by those claiming PIP (Personal Independence Payments) while talking with a radio broadcaster see video While fraud has seen an increase, from 0.0% to 0.4% which is approximately £1.2 billion, and is born out by the governments own 2025 figures. To put that in context, the welfare bill is £303.3 billion per year. Further comparison shows that tax fraud in the UK figures were £48.8 billion a year, and known tax evasion was £0.7 billion. So it would take a person on a...
Post a Comment
Read more