Skip to main content

DWP Cuts and Their Impact on Women

DWP Cuts and Their Impact on Women: A Call for Rethink

So here's something that’s been causing quite a stir—proposed cuts to disability benefits by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) in the UK. Women’s groups are voicing serious concerns, and here’s why it matters.

Recently, dozens of women’s organisations have urged Rachel Reeves to rethink these cuts. They’ve highlighted how these changes will strip away a “vital lifeline” for victims of abuse. But what’s really at stake here?


Economic Abuse and Vulnerability

Campaigners point out a harsh reality: disabled women are nearly twice as likely to face economic abuse compared to their non-disabled counterparts. Shockingly, they’re almost four times more likely to have someone try to stop them from accessing the benefits they need. These benefits aren’t just numbers on a page—they’re essential support systems that help women escape abusive situations.


The Unseen Burden on Women

Cuts could also mean that women would have to take on more unpaid care work for their loved ones if benefits are reduced. This often comes at a great cost to their own health and wellbeing. Imagine juggling care responsibilities without adequate support—it's a heavy load to bear.


Who’s Joining the Fight?

A diverse group of organisations has come together, including the Young Women’s Trust, Southall Black Sisters, and Glasgow Disability Alliance, among others. They’re all saying the same thing: these cuts could have devastating effects.


What Are They Asking For?

Reconsider the Cuts: They want the Chancellor to rethink the proposed cuts to social security for disabled people.

Impact Assessments: They’re calling for thorough assessments to understand how these changes affect disabled women, with a focus on age and ethnicity.

Taxation Reforms: There’s a push for changes to taxation that could generate more revenue from wealthier individuals and corporations. This could help fund essential services.

Safeguards for Vulnerable Groups: It’s crucial to ensure that benefit removals don’t hinder women’s ability to escape abuse.

Support for Caregivers: Recognising the potential negative impact on caregivers, particularly women, who may face increased unpaid responsibilities.


Why It Matters

Public services and social security are pillars of a healthy economy and gender equality. Cutting them could undermine efforts to tackle child poverty and promote equality. Let’s hope this conversation leads to thoughtful reconsideration, ensuring support systems remain intact for those who need them most.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Wolf in Reformist Clothing

A Wolf in Reformist Clothing: Dissecting the Structural Ableism of Reform UK's SEND "Vision" As a Green Party Disability Officer with three decades of experience, and as a parent who has spent 15 years battling intransigent local authorities for my neurodivergent son, and others, I watched Richard Tice’s press statement with a familiar, corrosive fury. This is not a blueprint for reform. It is a masterclass in the very structural ableism and neoliberal betrayal that has manufactured the SEND crisis. So come with me, and let’s dissect it with the critical eye that it demands. The Insidious Linguistics of Erasure Tice with his core creed: “Nobody's disabled, people are differently abled.” This phrase is not progressive; it is erasure. It is a feel-good, ablest euphemism designed to sanitise the reality of disability in a society structured against us. Disability is not a matter of “different ability”; it is an interaction between impairment and t...

LibDem Conference 2025

Following last week's observations of the Reform UK Ltd conference, I had hoped that there would be nothing to report from the Liberal Democrats conference as far as disability is concerned. How wrong was I? While at the conference their leader, Sir Ed Davey, stocked the fires of the hostile environment towards the sick and disabled, using tired old tropes and unsupported figures! See video For istance, Sir Ed, sounding very right wing himself, regurgitated the "fact" that there is widespread fraud by those claiming PIP (Personal Independence Payments) while talking with a radio broadcaster see video While fraud has seen an increase, from 0.0% to 0.4% which is approximately £1.2 billion, and is born out by the governments own 2025 figures. To put that in context, the welfare bill is £303.3 billion per year. Further comparison shows that tax fraud in the UK figures were £48.8 billion a year, and known tax evasion was £0.7 billion. So it would take a person on a...

Black Hole in Council's Accountability

A Black Hole of Accountability What Telford & Wrekin Council’s Silence on Disability Safety Really Means Let’s cut straight to the chase. When a council proudly stamps its correspondence with “Protect, Care and Invest,” you’d expect a certain baseline of transparency, especially on a matter of life and death. Instead, what we get from Telford & Wrekin Council is a masterclass in bureaucratic evasion, wrapped in polite, redacted paperwork. The story is simple, and damning. A concerned disabilities officer writes to the Council Leader, Lee Carter, in March 2025.  His subject? The urgent, glaring, and morally indefensible lack of proper Personal Emergency Evacuation Plans (PEEPs) for disabled residents in high-rise buildings. He invokes Grenfell. He names local towers. He begs for action, specifically for Carter to lobby local MP Shaun Davies. It’s a cry for basic safety, born from a tragedy that should have changed everything. T...