Skip to main content

Labour's Approach to Disability Safety

Labour's Approach to Disability Safety: More of the Same?


As the UK geared up for the 2024 general election, many scrutinised the Labour Party's promises of "change," particularly regarding disability safety in high-rise buildings. 

Fast forward to February 2025 with a Labour government and despite their rhetoric, Labour's stance on Personal Emergency Evacuation Plans (PEEPs) seems disappointingly similar to the previous Tory government’s approach, leaving many questioning the authenticity of their commitment to improve safety for disabled individuals.


The Importance of PEEPs

The devastating Grenfell Tower fire in 2017, which claimed 72 lives, underscored the critical need for personalised evacuation strategies for disabled residents. The inquiry that followed strongly recommended the implementation of PEEPs to ensure that people with mobility issues could safely evacuate during emergencies. This wasn't just a suggestion; it was a call to action to prevent future tragedies.


Labour's Response: A Missed Opportunity?

Initially, Labour leaders, including Sir Keir Starmer, vowed to prioritise safety and heed the lessons from Grenfell. However, their recent proposals have been criticised for lacking substance. The introduction of "Residential PEEPs" — an approach that requires building managers to conduct fire risk assessments and engage with vulnerable residents — stops short of establishing a legal obligation for bespoke evacuation plans.


Outcry from Disability Rights Organisations

Disability rights advocates are understandably frustrated with Labour's handling of the issue. Many see the "Residential PEEPs" as little more than a rebranding of existing procedures, lacking the robust, individualised plans needed to ensure safety. These organisations view Labour's actions as a betrayal of their commitments, leaving disabled residents vulnerable and at risk.


Local Green Party Response 

Telford and Wrekin Green Party Disabilities Officer, Mark Webster, argues that these measures are insufficient. "By allowing building managers discretion over safety protocols, there's no guarantee that all residents, especially those with disabilities, will receive the necessary protection". He also explained that "the potential for costs to fall on disabled residents themselves further complicates matters, raising questions about equity and fairness".

"I have written to both Labour MP Shaun Davies, and Councillor Lee Carter, Labour leader of Telford and Wrekin Council, highlighting the issue, and urging them to lobby for disabled people's rights and advocate for fully implementing the Grenfell Reports findings, in order to protect Telford and Wrekin residents".

Examples from the Ground: Telford and Ketley

In places like The Haybridge Hadley (formerly Hadley Manor flats) in The Wrekin and Reynolds House in Ketley Telford, the need for effective PEEPs is pressing. Residents in these high-rise flats deserve more than just promises—they need concrete, enforceable plans that prioritise their safety. Unfortunately, Labour’s current proposals do not to provide that assurance.


A Call for True Change

Labour's handling of PEEPs raises serious concerns about their commitment to real change. By not fully implementing the Grenfell Inquiry's recommendations, they risk repeating past mistakes and failing their disabled constituents. 


It's time for Labour to step up with genuine, impactful policies that ensure the safety and rights of all residents, especially the most vulnerable. Anything less is simply not enough.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Wolf in Reformist Clothing

A Wolf in Reformist Clothing: Dissecting the Structural Ableism of Reform UK's SEND "Vision" As a Green Party Disability Officer with three decades of experience, and as a parent who has spent 15 years battling intransigent local authorities for my neurodivergent son, and others, I watched Richard Tice’s press statement with a familiar, corrosive fury. This is not a blueprint for reform. It is a masterclass in the very structural ableism and neoliberal betrayal that has manufactured the SEND crisis. So come with me, and let’s dissect it with the critical eye that it demands. The Insidious Linguistics of Erasure Tice with his core creed: “Nobody's disabled, people are differently abled.” This phrase is not progressive; it is erasure. It is a feel-good, ablest euphemism designed to sanitise the reality of disability in a society structured against us. Disability is not a matter of “different ability”; it is an interaction between impairment and t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Black Hole in Council's Accountability

A Black Hole of Accountability What Telford & Wrekin Council’s Silence on Disability Safety Really Means Let’s cut straight to the chase. When a council proudly stamps its correspondence with “Protect, Care and Invest,” you’d expect a certain baseline of transparency, especially on a matter of life and death. Instead, what we get from Telford & Wrekin Council is a masterclass in bureaucratic evasion, wrapped in polite, redacted paperwork. The story is simple, and damning. A concerned disabilities officer writes to the Council Leader, Lee Carter, in March 2025.  His subject? The urgent, glaring, and morally indefensible lack of proper Personal Emergency Evacuation Plans (PEEPs) for disabled residents in high-rise buildings. He invokes Grenfell. He names local towers. He begs for action, specifically for Carter to lobby local MP Shaun Davies. It’s a cry for basic safety, born from a tragedy that should have changed everything. T...
Post a Comment
Read more

Telford's High-Stakes Gamble

Telford's High-Stakes Gamble: Our Council is Betting Our Future on the Property Market! Let’s talk about our money. Specifically, let's talk about Telford and Wrekin Council's finances. On the surface, the story is a political dream. The council boasts 16 years of balanced budgets, low council tax, and a knack for winning government grants. They’ve managed to navigate over £180 million in government cuts since 2010. It sounds like a miracle of financial management, right? But when you pull back the curtain, a much riskier and more concerning picture emerges. Our council isn’t just collecting bins and fixing potholes anymore; it’s behaving like a high-stakes property speculator. The Property Gambler The cornerstone of the council’s financial “resilience” is its commercial property portfolio. Through its ‘Grade Fund’ and ‘Nu Place’ investments, the council generates over £12 million a year. This money is used to plug gaps in services and keep our counc...
Post a Comment
Read more