Skip to main content

Labour's Approach to Disability Safety

Labour's Approach to Disability Safety: More of the Same?


As the UK geared up for the 2024 general election, many scrutinised the Labour Party's promises of "change," particularly regarding disability safety in high-rise buildings. 

Fast forward to February 2025 with a Labour government and despite their rhetoric, Labour's stance on Personal Emergency Evacuation Plans (PEEPs) seems disappointingly similar to the previous Tory government’s approach, leaving many questioning the authenticity of their commitment to improve safety for disabled individuals.


The Importance of PEEPs

The devastating Grenfell Tower fire in 2017, which claimed 72 lives, underscored the critical need for personalised evacuation strategies for disabled residents. The inquiry that followed strongly recommended the implementation of PEEPs to ensure that people with mobility issues could safely evacuate during emergencies. This wasn't just a suggestion; it was a call to action to prevent future tragedies.


Labour's Response: A Missed Opportunity?

Initially, Labour leaders, including Sir Keir Starmer, vowed to prioritise safety and heed the lessons from Grenfell. However, their recent proposals have been criticised for lacking substance. The introduction of "Residential PEEPs" — an approach that requires building managers to conduct fire risk assessments and engage with vulnerable residents — stops short of establishing a legal obligation for bespoke evacuation plans.


Outcry from Disability Rights Organisations

Disability rights advocates are understandably frustrated with Labour's handling of the issue. Many see the "Residential PEEPs" as little more than a rebranding of existing procedures, lacking the robust, individualised plans needed to ensure safety. These organisations view Labour's actions as a betrayal of their commitments, leaving disabled residents vulnerable and at risk.


Local Green Party Response 

Telford and Wrekin Green Party Disabilities Officer, Mark Webster, argues that these measures are insufficient. "By allowing building managers discretion over safety protocols, there's no guarantee that all residents, especially those with disabilities, will receive the necessary protection". He also explained that "the potential for costs to fall on disabled residents themselves further complicates matters, raising questions about equity and fairness".

"I have written to both Labour MP Shaun Davies, and Councillor Lee Carter, Labour leader of Telford and Wrekin Council, highlighting the issue, and urging them to lobby for disabled people's rights and advocate for fully implementing the Grenfell Reports findings, in order to protect Telford and Wrekin residents".

Examples from the Ground: Telford and Ketley

In places like The Haybridge Hadley (formerly Hadley Manor flats) in The Wrekin and Reynolds House in Ketley Telford, the need for effective PEEPs is pressing. Residents in these high-rise flats deserve more than just promises—they need concrete, enforceable plans that prioritise their safety. Unfortunately, Labour’s current proposals do not to provide that assurance.


A Call for True Change

Labour's handling of PEEPs raises serious concerns about their commitment to real change. By not fully implementing the Grenfell Inquiry's recommendations, they risk repeating past mistakes and failing their disabled constituents. 


It's time for Labour to step up with genuine, impactful policies that ensure the safety and rights of all residents, especially the most vulnerable. Anything less is simply not enough.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Farage's Cruelty-Autism

Farage's Cruelty & Misinformation on Autism: A Call for Compassion and Truth in Autism Awareness Month - by Mark Webster, Disability Officer with The Green Party Telford and Wrekin  As Autism Awareness and Acceptance Month 2025 draws to a close,  the need for understanding, compassion, and factual discussion about autism and the SEND (Special Educational Needs and Disabilities) system has never been more urgent. Yet, Nigel Farage and Reform UK have chosen this crucial moment to spread harmful and inaccurate narratives about autism diagnosis, compounding stigma and misunderstanding for autistic people and their families across the UK. SEND (Special Educational Needs and Disabilities) is a blanket term that refers to conditions or difficulties that make it hard for a person to learn or access education compared to others, such as learning disabilities, physical disabilities, or emotional and behavioral challenges.  Farage’s Harmful Claims In a series of recent statemen...
Post a Comment
Read more

Davies:Missing Inaction

Shaun Davies and Labour’s Water Woes: A Tale of Empty Promises and Missed Votes Let’s talk about Shaun Davies, the Labour MP for Telford, who proudly claims to be “Standing Up for Telford.” Well, on the 28th of January 2025, he was notably *not* standing up for Telford—or anyone else, for that matter—when it came to voting on the Water (Special Measures) Bill. In fact, he didn’t show up at all. And he wasn’t alone. Many of his Labour colleagues also failed to turn up, leaving critical amendments to the bill hanging in the balance. So much for standing up for clean water and environmental accountability. The Water (Special Measures) Bill wasn’t just another piece of legislation. It was a chance to address the UK’s ongoing water crisis—a crisis that has seen rivers polluted, habitats destroyed, and water companies raking in profits while customers foot the bill for their failures. The amendments proposed were not just sensible; they were necessary. One key amendment would have ensured th...
Post a Comment
Read more

Hidden Cost of Caring

Hidden Costs Why Our Family Carers Deserve Better Imagine waking up every day knowing that your entire world revolves around caring for a loved one with disabilities. You’re doing everything you can to keep them safe, comfortable, and loved — often at great personal cost.  Now, consider this: nearly half of parent carers in the UK say their income doesn’t even cover basic needs like food and housing. That’s almost 44%. And if your fridge breaks or your bed falls apart? Over 80% of carers say they couldn’t replace essentials without going into debt or going without. It’s heartbreaking, isn’t it? And yet, these are the everyday realities for millions of families. Many are skipping meals just to make sure their children eat, with over half of parent carers doing so.  Meanwhile, a staggering 93% of families want to work paid jobs, but caring responsibilities make that practically impossible. The emotional toll is equally heavy, with 28% of parent carers likely to be clinically dep...
Post a Comment
Read more