Skip to main content

Labour’s SEND Stumble

Is This a War on the Disabled?

If you’re a parent of a child with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND), you’re probably used to fighting for every inch of support. But after the Schools Minister’s (Catherine McKinnell MP)

latest appearance before the Education Select Committee, you might be left wondering: is this really the best Labour can offer? And, more pointedly, is this government waging war on the disabled?

Let’s talk about what actually happened. The Minister, pressed for answers about the government’s plans to fix the spiraling SEND crisis, offered little more than a political shrug: “Wait for the schools white paper.” For thousands of families desperate for clarity, this was hardly reassuring.

Even MPs on the committee struggled to get a straight answer. Sir James Cleverly summed up the frustration: “I didn't hear anything in your opening introduction that gave me the slightest clue as to how you're going to fundamentally address what we all agree is currently an unsustainable situation.” That’s not just parliamentary nitpicking—it’s a reflection of what parents across the country are feeling.

The reality for many? More questions than answers. Parents want to know: “Will my child get the support in education that they need?” So far, there’s no clear response. Labour’s Catherine McKinnell tried to reassure everyone, claiming, “We won’t be removing any existing effective support.” But with no detail or plan, critics say this statement is as clear as mud.

Labour MP Jess Asato cut to the heart of the matter: “Many desperate parents have said that fighting for an EHCP [Education, Health and Care Plan]…has been the only lever that they had.” The committee chair didn’t mince words either, noting a “real collapse in the trust and confidence of parents in the system.”

Even the Minister conceded, “how difficult the system is currently for parents and carers and young people to navigate.” That’s an understatement for families who feel like every day is a battle.

The fundamental problem is clear: the system isn’t just complicated—it’s adversarial. And as was pointed out in the meeting, “the existence of the law doesn’t make the system adversarial: it’s non-compliance with the law that does that.” In other words, it’s not the rules that are broken—it’s the government’s willingness to follow them.

The Minister talked up a “less adversarial and more sustainable redress system,” but with no timetable, no roadmap, and no transparency, families are left clutching at promises instead of progress.

Helen Hayes MP

Helen Hayes MP asked what everyone was thinking: “Given all of that engagement, why you haven't launched a national engagement strategy…?” Why indeed.

Let’s be honest. With the government’s recent attacks on disability welfare—slashing benefits, tightening eligibility, and shifting the goalposts—it’s getting harder to believe that what we’re seeing isn’t a coordinated campaign against the disabled. When you combine those policies with the current chaos and confusion in SEND support, families have every right to worry.

Parents and children deserve better than platitudes and paperwork. They deserve a system that works, a government that listens, and the support they need—when they need it.

Until Labour can offer more than vague promises and empty reassurances, it’s fair to ask: whose side are they really on? For now, it certainly doesn’t feel like the side of the disabled.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Wolf in Reformist Clothing

A Wolf in Reformist Clothing: Dissecting the Structural Ableism of Reform UK's SEND "Vision" As a Green Party Disability Officer with three decades of experience, and as a parent who has spent 15 years battling intransigent local authorities for my neurodivergent son, and others, I watched Richard Tice’s press statement with a familiar, corrosive fury. This is not a blueprint for reform. It is a masterclass in the very structural ableism and neoliberal betrayal that has manufactured the SEND crisis. So come with me, and let’s dissect it with the critical eye that it demands. The Insidious Linguistics of Erasure Tice with his core creed: “Nobody's disabled, people are differently abled.” This phrase is not progressive; it is erasure. It is a feel-good, ablest euphemism designed to sanitise the reality of disability in a society structured against us. Disability is not a matter of “different ability”; it is an interaction between impairment and t...

Black Hole in Council's Accountability

A Black Hole of Accountability What Telford & Wrekin Council’s Silence on Disability Safety Really Means Let’s cut straight to the chase. When a council proudly stamps its correspondence with “Protect, Care and Invest,” you’d expect a certain baseline of transparency, especially on a matter of life and death. Instead, what we get from Telford & Wrekin Council is a masterclass in bureaucratic evasion, wrapped in polite, redacted paperwork. The story is simple, and damning. A concerned disabilities officer writes to the Council Leader, Lee Carter, in March 2025.  His subject? The urgent, glaring, and morally indefensible lack of proper Personal Emergency Evacuation Plans (PEEPs) for disabled residents in high-rise buildings. He invokes Grenfell. He names local towers. He begs for action, specifically for Carter to lobby local MP Shaun Davies. It’s a cry for basic safety, born from a tragedy that should have changed everything. T...

Telford's High-Stakes Gamble

Telford's High-Stakes Gamble: Our Council is Betting Our Future on the Property Market! Let’s talk about our money. Specifically, let's talk about Telford and Wrekin Council's finances. On the surface, the story is a political dream. The council boasts 16 years of balanced budgets, low council tax, and a knack for winning government grants. They’ve managed to navigate over £180 million in government cuts since 2010. It sounds like a miracle of financial management, right? But when you pull back the curtain, a much riskier and more concerning picture emerges. Our council isn’t just collecting bins and fixing potholes anymore; it’s behaving like a high-stakes property speculator. The Property Gambler The cornerstone of the council’s financial “resilience” is its commercial property portfolio. Through its ‘Grade Fund’ and ‘Nu Place’ investments, the council generates over £12 million a year. This money is used to plug gaps in services and keep our counc...