Universal Credit & Personal Independence Payment Bill Reaction

Universal Credit & Personal Independence Payment Bill Reaction:

Disappointment in Labour's Approach to Disability Rights

The recent actions of the Labour government have left many advocates for disability rights bitterly disappointed. A party historically founded on principles of equality and social justice seems to have strayed from its core values, particularly in its treatment of disabled individuals. The proposed "Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payments Bill" is a glaring example of this troubling trend.

A Betrayal of Founding Principles

Labour's decision to support legislation that targets disabled people for cuts is a stark departure from its foundational principles. Advocacy groups, including Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, have condemned the bill as discriminatory and harmful. Amnesty's reports indicate that the bill would not only deepen poverty but also create a two-tier welfare system that disproportionately affects disabled individuals. This is particularly disheartening coming from a party that has long championed the rights of marginalised communities.

The United Nations has previously highlighted the UK's systemic violations of disabled people's rights, and the latest proposals only serve to reinforce these concerns. The UN's investigations have shown that the UK government has made little progress in addressing these abuses, and Labour's support for such legislation raises serious questions about its commitment to human rights.

Voices of Concern from Disability Charities

Over 80 disability charities voiced their objections to the bill, warning that it could lead to significant harm for vulnerable populations. The proposed cuts push people into poverty, including thousands of children, which is a direct contradiction to Labour's stated goals of reducing inequality and supporting those in need.

Rick Burgess, a disability rights activist, has pointed out that the government's approach reflects a broader societal issue of ableism, where disabled lives are undervalued and seen as a burden rather than an integral part of society. This sentiment resonates deeply with many who have fought tirelessly for the rights of disabled individuals, only to see their struggles dismissed by those in power.

The disappointment felt by advocates is palpable. The Labour government, which once stood as a beacon of hope for social justice, had now alienated significant portion of its base by failing to uphold the rights and dignity of disabled people.

As the fight for equality continues, it is crucial for all political parties to remember their commitments to human rights and to prioritise the needs of the most vulnerable in society.

Mark Webster

Disability Officer

The Green Party

(Telford and Wrekin)

Comments

Farage's Cruelty-Autism

Farage's Cruelty & Misinformation on Autism: A Call for Compassion and Truth in Autism Awareness Month - by Mark Webster, Disability Officer with The Green Party Telford and Wrekin As Autism Awareness and Acceptance Month 2025 draws to a close, the need for understanding, compassion, and factual discussion about autism and the SEND (Special Educational Needs and Disabilities) system has never been more urgent. Yet, Nigel Farage and Reform UK have chosen this crucial moment to spread harmful and inaccurate narratives about autism diagnosis, compounding stigma and misunderstanding for autistic people and their families across the UK. SEND (Special Educational Needs and Disabilities) is a blanket term that refers to conditions or difficulties that make it hard for a person to learn or access education compared to others, such as learning disabilities, physical disabilities, or emotional and behavioral challenges. Farage’s Harmful Claims In a series of recent statemen...

A Wolf in Reformist Clothing

A Wolf in Reformist Clothing: Dissecting the Structural Ableism of Reform UK's SEND "Vision" As a Green Party Disability Officer with three decades of experience, and as a parent who has spent 15 years battling intransigent local authorities for my neurodivergent son, and others, I watched Richard Tice’s press statement with a familiar, corrosive fury. This is not a blueprint for reform. It is a masterclass in the very structural ableism and neoliberal betrayal that has manufactured the SEND crisis. So come with me, and let’s dissect it with the critical eye that it demands. The Insidious Linguistics of Erasure Tice with his core creed: “Nobody's disabled, people are differently abled.” This phrase is not progressive; it is erasure. It is a feel-good, ablest euphemism designed to sanitise the reality of disability in a society structured against us. Disability is not a matter of “different ability”; it is an interaction between impairment and t...

Hidden Cost of Caring

Hidden Costs Why Our Family Carers Deserve Better Imagine waking up every day knowing that your entire world revolves around caring for a loved one with disabilities. You’re doing everything you can to keep them safe, comfortable, and loved — often at great personal cost. Now, consider this: nearly half of parent carers in the UK say their income doesn’t even cover basic needs like food and housing. That’s almost 44%. And if your fridge breaks or your bed falls apart? Over 80% of carers say they couldn’t replace essentials without going into debt or going without. It’s heartbreaking, isn’t it? And yet, these are the everyday realities for millions of families. Many are skipping meals just to make sure their children eat, with over half of parent carers doing so. Meanwhile, a staggering 93% of families want to work paid jobs, but caring responsibilities make that practically impossible. The emotional toll is equally heavy, with 28% of parent carers likely to be clinically dep...

Mark That Disabled Green Party Guy

Search This Blog