Skip to main content

Welfare Myth Exposed

Welfare Myth Exposed 

Tory Viscount Younger recently reiterated in The House of Lords, a claim regarding the financial situation of disabled people receiving disability welfare, when he stated that a disabled person receiving the health element of Universal Credit (UC), along with the average level of housing benefit and Personal Independence Payment (PIP), "earns" £2,500 more annually than a worker on the national living wage. This assertion is based on research from the Centre for Social Justice (CSJ).

Conservative Viscount Younger

The Claim

The claim originates from research conducted by the CSJ, which suggests that people on certain "benefits" can have a higher income than those earning the national living wage. 

Specifically, their findings indicate that a non-working Universal Credit claimant receiving the average housing benefit and PIP could have an income of around £25,000, compared to approximately £22,500 for a full-time worker on the national living wage after taxes.

Context Is Important 

It is crucial to understand that PIP, and the Universal Credit (health component) are designed to assist with the extra costs associated with disabilities, rather than to serve as a direct income replacement. 

This context is often overlooked in discussions about the comparative earnings of benefit recipients versus wage earners. The framing of these benefits as "earnings" can mislead the public about the nature and purpose of these payments.

Implications of the Misleading Claim

Viscount Younger of Leckie's assertion is sparking debate about welfare dependency and the adequacy of support for disabled individuals. 

Critics, including various peers in the House of Lords, such as The Green Party's Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle have expressed concern that such statements can perpetuate negative stereotypes about disabled people and their reliance on state support. 

Green Party: Baroness Bennett 

They rightly argue that the focus should be on the necessity of these benefits for covering essential living costs rather than comparing them to wages.

The claim made by Viscount Younger reflects a broader and often negative narrative about welfare and disability benefits in the UK, emphasising the financial comparisons between benefit recipients and minimum wage workers. 

While the figures cited may be accurate in a strict numerical sense, the framing of these benefits as "earnings" obscures the reality of the financial challenges faced by disabled individuals. 

Harmful Framing

This harmful framing not only misrepresents the financial realities faced by disabled individuals but also underscores a broader issue: the national minimum wage is insufficient to provide a living income for workers. 

The race to the bottom in wage competition, where employers prioritise profits over fair compensation, perpetuates a cycle of poverty and reliance on welfare. 

As the national living wage increased to £12.21 in April 2025, we must make employers recognise their responsibility to pay fair wages that reflect the cost of living, rather than exploit the disparities in income between benefit recipients and low-wage workers. 

The situation calls for a reevaluation of wage policies to ensure that all workers, regardless of their circumstances, are compensated adequately for their work and then fostering a more equal society.

Imagine a future where a Green Party-led government transforms the landscape of support for disabled individuals and low-wage workers alike.

By prioritising a compassionate welfare system, the Greens would ensure that benefits like Personal Independence Payment (PIP) and Universal Credit are not just safety nets but pathways to dignity and independence. 

We could implement policies that guarantee fair wages for all workers, addressing the inadequacies of the national living wage, which currently leaves many struggling to make ends meet. 

Also, by investing heavily in public services, particularly the NHS, and raising taxes on the wealthiest, we would create a more equal society where the financial burdens of disability are acknowledged and alleviated. 

Our vision not only aims to end the stigma surrounding disability benefits but also fosters a society where every individual, regardless of their circumstances, can thrive and contribute meaningfully to their communities.


Mark Webster 

Disability Officer 

The Green Party 

Telford and Wrekin 



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Wolf in Reformist Clothing

A Wolf in Reformist Clothing: Dissecting the Structural Ableism of Reform UK's SEND "Vision" As a Green Party Disability Officer with three decades of experience, and as a parent who has spent 15 years battling intransigent local authorities for my neurodivergent son, and others, I watched Richard Tice’s press statement with a familiar, corrosive fury. This is not a blueprint for reform. It is a masterclass in the very structural ableism and neoliberal betrayal that has manufactured the SEND crisis. So come with me, and let’s dissect it with the critical eye that it demands. The Insidious Linguistics of Erasure Tice with his core creed: “Nobody's disabled, people are differently abled.” This phrase is not progressive; it is erasure. It is a feel-good, ablest euphemism designed to sanitise the reality of disability in a society structured against us. Disability is not a matter of “different ability”; it is an interaction between impairment and t...
Post a Comment
Read more

LibDem Conference 2025

Following last week's observations of the Reform UK Ltd conference, I had hoped that there would be nothing to report from the Liberal Democrats conference as far as disability is concerned. How wrong was I? While at the conference their leader, Sir Ed Davey, stocked the fires of the hostile environment towards the sick and disabled, using tired old tropes and unsupported figures! See video For istance, Sir Ed, sounding very right wing himself, regurgitated the "fact" that there is widespread fraud by those claiming PIP (Personal Independence Payments) while talking with a radio broadcaster see video While fraud has seen an increase, from 0.0% to 0.4% which is approximately £1.2 billion, and is born out by the governments own 2025 figures. To put that in context, the welfare bill is £303.3 billion per year. Further comparison shows that tax fraud in the UK figures were £48.8 billion a year, and known tax evasion was £0.7 billion. So it would take a person on a...
Post a Comment
Read more

Black Hole in Council's Accountability

A Black Hole of Accountability What Telford & Wrekin Council’s Silence on Disability Safety Really Means Let’s cut straight to the chase. When a council proudly stamps its correspondence with “Protect, Care and Invest,” you’d expect a certain baseline of transparency, especially on a matter of life and death. Instead, what we get from Telford & Wrekin Council is a masterclass in bureaucratic evasion, wrapped in polite, redacted paperwork. The story is simple, and damning. A concerned disabilities officer writes to the Council Leader, Lee Carter, in March 2025.  His subject? The urgent, glaring, and morally indefensible lack of proper Personal Emergency Evacuation Plans (PEEPs) for disabled residents in high-rise buildings. He invokes Grenfell. He names local towers. He begs for action, specifically for Carter to lobby local MP Shaun Davies. It’s a cry for basic safety, born from a tragedy that should have changed everything. T...
Post a Comment
Read more