SEND 48 Point Plan Revealed

MP's Reveal a 48 Point Plan for SEND Education

Helen Hayes Chair of the Committee

With their plans finally revealed, we take a look at what the Education Committee has had to suggest.

It is very long winded, and burdened with corporate speech, so we will break it down into four manageable pieces over four days in a hope of not overwhelming you, and end with a summary on day five!

You can of course head to the bottom of this page, and click the link provided in the Fact Check section and read the Education Committee Report in full for yourself.

But for those not inclined to wade through the latest committee report, here is day one for you.

Day 1: Understanding the Need for Change in SEND Education

Key Committee Takeaways

The government must ensure that every school has the necessary resources and expertise to support students with Special Educational Needs and Disabilities (SEND).

The committee emphasises the importance of maintaining statutory entitlements for children with SEND, rather than scaling them back.

The focus should be on improving the existing SEND system with clear accountability and support for parents.

The recent discussions among MPs highlight a crucial need for change in how schools support children with Special Educational Needs and Disabilities (SEND).

The education committee is asking for the government to set clear standards for resources, specialist expertise, and equipment that every school should have. This means that regardless of where our children go to school, they should have access to the support they need.

One of the key points raised is the importance of keeping legal entitlements intact. Parents should feel secure knowing that their children's needs will be met, whether or not they have a formal diagnosis or an Education, Health and Care Plan (EHCP). This is about ensuring that all children, especially those with SEND, receive the support they deserve.

Instead of overhauling the entire SEND system, the committee suggests a series of policies aimed at enhancing the current framework. This includes increasing accountability so that parents can trust that their children’s needs will be addressed effectively. The government plans to focus on making mainstream schools more inclusive, which is a step in the right direction.

Fact Check

Parliamentary Education Committee

Comments

A Wolf in Reformist Clothing

A Wolf in Reformist Clothing: Dissecting the Structural Ableism of Reform UK's SEND "Vision" As a Green Party Disability Officer with three decades of experience, and as a parent who has spent 15 years battling intransigent local authorities for my neurodivergent son, and others, I watched Richard Tice’s press statement with a familiar, corrosive fury. This is not a blueprint for reform. It is a masterclass in the very structural ableism and neoliberal betrayal that has manufactured the SEND crisis. So come with me, and let’s dissect it with the critical eye that it demands. The Insidious Linguistics of Erasure Tice with his core creed: “Nobody's disabled, people are differently abled.” This phrase is not progressive; it is erasure. It is a feel-good, ablest euphemism designed to sanitise the reality of disability in a society structured against us. Disability is not a matter of “different ability”; it is an interaction between impairment and t...

Black Hole in Council's Accountability

A Black Hole of Accountability What Telford & Wrekin Council’s Silence on Disability Safety Really Means Let’s cut straight to the chase. When a council proudly stamps its correspondence with “Protect, Care and Invest,” you’d expect a certain baseline of transparency, especially on a matter of life and death. Instead, what we get from Telford & Wrekin Council is a masterclass in bureaucratic evasion, wrapped in polite, redacted paperwork. The story is simple, and damning. A concerned disabilities officer writes to the Council Leader, Lee Carter, in March 2025. His subject? The urgent, glaring, and morally indefensible lack of proper Personal Emergency Evacuation Plans (PEEPs) for disabled residents in high-rise buildings. He invokes Grenfell. He names local towers. He begs for action, specifically for Carter to lobby local MP Shaun Davies. It’s a cry for basic safety, born from a tragedy that should have changed everything. T...

Telford's High-Stakes Gamble

Telford's High-Stakes Gamble: Our Council is Betting Our Future on the Property Market! Let’s talk about our money. Specifically, let's talk about Telford and Wrekin Council's finances. On the surface, the story is a political dream. The council boasts 16 years of balanced budgets, low council tax, and a knack for winning government grants. They’ve managed to navigate over £180 million in government cuts since 2010. It sounds like a miracle of financial management, right? But when you pull back the curtain, a much riskier and more concerning picture emerges. Our council isn’t just collecting bins and fixing potholes anymore; it’s behaving like a high-stakes property speculator. The Property Gambler The cornerstone of the council’s financial “resilience” is its commercial property portfolio. Through its ‘Grade Fund’ and ‘Nu Place’ investments, the council generates over £12 million a year. This money is used to plug gaps in services and keep our counc...

Mark That Disabled Green Party Guy

Search This Blog