Skip to main content

Timms Review Update September 2025

The ongoing Timms Review, aimed at reforming the Personal Independence Payment (PIP), has become a focal point of concern for many in the disabled community. As the review struggles to establish its framework, the Labour government’s seemingly unchanged negative attitude towards the sick and disabled is becoming increasingly evident.

Current Challenges in the Timms Review

Stephen Timms, the Minister for Social Security and Disability, is facing significant hurdles in recruiting committee members for the review. Initially expected to comprise 12 members, including a co-chair from the Regional Stakeholders Network, the process has been delayed due to confusion over member selection and the overall direction of the review. This lack of clarity raises alarms about the government's commitment to genuinely involving disabled individuals in the decision-making process, which is crucial for building trust within the community. 

A coalition of 17 organisations, including the Law Centres Network has called forced meaningful co-production in the Timms Review. They emphasise the necessity of involving a diverse range of disabled individuals and experts to ensure that the review addresses the real needs and rights of disabled people. Their recommendations highlight the importance of transparency and parliamentary scrutiny, which are essential for fostering accountability in the review process. However, the government's response to these calls remains tepid, suggesting a reluctance to fully engage with the community it aims to serve.

Parliamentary Scrutiny and Concerns

The Commons Work and Pensions Committee has raised critical questions regarding the review, particularly concerning its co-production arrangements and potential impacts on the PIP budget. There are fears that the review could lead to cuts in PIP funding or eligibility, which would have dire consequences for the living standards of disabled individuals. The committee's request for a response from Timms by September 17 underscores the urgency of these inquiries, yet skepticism remains about whether the government will provide satisfactory answers.

Implications for Disability Benefits

The Timms Review is positioned to significantly influence the future of disability benefits in the UK, particularly regarding the PIP assessment process. Originally intended to streamline the transition from the work capability assessment, the review's scope has expanded amid political pressures and public scrutiny. As the government grapples with the implications of potential cuts and the need for reform, the outcomes of this review will have lasting effects on the health, personal independence, and living standards of disabled individuals across the country.

In discussions surrounding welfare and disability benefits, Timms has expressed concerns about the forecast spending on incapacity and disability benefits. He emphasised the need for better employment support to help more people return to work. However, this sentiment seems rather odd, considering the government has cut the very schemes designed to assist disabled individuals in securing employment. This contradiction raises questions about the sincerity of the government's commitment to supporting disabled people in the workforce.

Ongoing Issues and Concerns

Several troubling aspects continue to affect disabled individuals and their carers:

PIP Application Process: The application and reassessment process for PIP remains outdated and burdensome, causing significant stress for applicants, particularly those with permanent health conditions.

Face-to-Face Assessments: There is a push to return to more face-to-face assessments for PIP, as many constituents have reported negative experiences with remote assessments, leading to anxiety and psychological harm.

Access to Work Funding Cuts 

Allegations of backdoor cuts to Access to Work benefits, which are vital for disabled individuals seeking employment support, have emerged. The lack of clarity from Timms on this issue suggests a continuation of the previous government's attitude towards disability support. See fact check links below. 

Mental Health Support
 
The necessity for investment in community mental health services has been acknowledged, yet the funding remains inadequate, leaving many disabled individuals without the support they need.

Impact on Carers
 
Concerns regarding overpayments related to carer’s allowance have surfaced, with some individuals facing significant debts due to overpayment issues.


As Parliament breaks for conference season, the likelihood of receiving further clarity on these pressing issues diminishes. The ongoing bureaucratic challenges and proposed changes to disability benefits leave many disabled individuals and their families in a precarious position, uncertain about their future support.

The Timms Review highlights a troubling status quo in the government's approach to disability support. The lack of meaningful engagement with the disabled community, coupled with the potential for cuts to vital benefits, reflects a concerning attitude that prioritises budgetary constraints over the well-being of some of the most vulnerable members of society. It is imperative that the government listens to the voices of disabled individuals and takes genuine steps towards reform that truly supports their needs and rights.


Follow Links for Fact Checking:

Disabled people warn of secret cuts to DWP Access to Work grants - Big Issue https://share.google/bh3nqX0tdpnw4iNQ4

View the Hansard contribution by The Minister for Social Security and Disability (Sir Stephen Timms) on Monday 1 September 2025 https://hansard.parliament.uk/Commons/2025-09-01/debates/C0F38F0A-979B-47CD-9F86-2E4B02108C00/TopicalQuestions#contribution-FCE8904A-C1C2-4A50-AF41-A4DCCC8152CD


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Wolf in Reformist Clothing

A Wolf in Reformist Clothing: Dissecting the Structural Ableism of Reform UK's SEND "Vision" As a Green Party Disability Officer with three decades of experience, and as a parent who has spent 15 years battling intransigent local authorities for my neurodivergent son, and others, I watched Richard Tice’s press statement with a familiar, corrosive fury. This is not a blueprint for reform. It is a masterclass in the very structural ableism and neoliberal betrayal that has manufactured the SEND crisis. So come with me, and let’s dissect it with the critical eye that it demands. The Insidious Linguistics of Erasure Tice with his core creed: “Nobody's disabled, people are differently abled.” This phrase is not progressive; it is erasure. It is a feel-good, ablest euphemism designed to sanitise the reality of disability in a society structured against us. Disability is not a matter of “different ability”; it is an interaction between impairment and t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Farage's Cruelty-Autism

Farage's Cruelty & Misinformation on Autism: A Call for Compassion and Truth in Autism Awareness Month - by Mark Webster, Disability Officer with The Green Party Telford and Wrekin  As Autism Awareness and Acceptance Month 2025 draws to a close,  the need for understanding, compassion, and factual discussion about autism and the SEND (Special Educational Needs and Disabilities) system has never been more urgent. Yet, Nigel Farage and Reform UK have chosen this crucial moment to spread harmful and inaccurate narratives about autism diagnosis, compounding stigma and misunderstanding for autistic people and their families across the UK. SEND (Special Educational Needs and Disabilities) is a blanket term that refers to conditions or difficulties that make it hard for a person to learn or access education compared to others, such as learning disabilities, physical disabilities, or emotional and behavioral challenges.  Farage’s Harmful Claims In a series of recent statemen...
Post a Comment
Read more

LibDem Conference 2025

Following last week's observations of the Reform UK Ltd conference, I had hoped that there would be nothing to report from the Liberal Democrats conference as far as disability is concerned. How wrong was I? While at the conference their leader, Sir Ed Davey, stocked the fires of the hostile environment towards the sick and disabled, using tired old tropes and unsupported figures! See video For istance, Sir Ed, sounding very right wing himself, regurgitated the "fact" that there is widespread fraud by those claiming PIP (Personal Independence Payments) while talking with a radio broadcaster see video While fraud has seen an increase, from 0.0% to 0.4% which is approximately £1.2 billion, and is born out by the governments own 2025 figures. To put that in context, the welfare bill is £303.3 billion per year. Further comparison shows that tax fraud in the UK figures were £48.8 billion a year, and known tax evasion was £0.7 billion. So it would take a person on a...
Post a Comment
Read more