Skip to main content

Davies Fails to Engage with Disability Charity at Party Conference

On behalf of the disability charity SCOPE, I sent an invitation to the Labour MP for Telford, Shaun Davies, for a fringe event at the Labour Party conference in Liverpool. His response among my disabled groups and their families has sparked significant disappointment. 

In a genuinely heartfelt invitation, I sought to engage Shaun Davies in a discussion about the pressing financial struggles faced by disabled individuals, as highlighted in the charity SCOPE's Price Tag of disability report. Instead of a meaningful dialogue, Davies responded with a generic, government-centric reply that missed the essence of the concerns expressed. 

While it is true that his response contained accurate information regarding benefits such as Personal Independence Payment (PIP), Attendance Allowance (AA), and Disability Living Allowance (DLA), this accuracy felt hollow. His reply was a standard recitation of government policy, devoid of any acknowledgment of the real crises that I described—issues like the inability to afford medication, a wheelchair broken by poor infrastructure, and the profound social isolation that many disabled individuals experience.

The quality of Davies' response was notably poor, especially given the context of the request. Rather than addressing the specific invitation to meet with SCOPE at the Labour Party Conference, he provided a defensive, cookie-cutter defense of the status quo. The tone of his message, while superficially polite, came across as bureaucratic and impersonal, lacking any genuine curiosity about disabled families situations in Telford or the data presented in the SCOPE report. This disconnect illustrates a troubling trend where constituents feel unheard and unvalued when faced with formulaic responses from their elected representatives.

Moreover, the content of Davies' reply was fundamentally misaligned with the purpose of my invitation. While I sought a conversation about solutions and allyship, Davies delivered a pamphlet on existing policies. His mention of the ongoing PIP review, intended to reassure, only highlighted a lack of urgency in addressing the immediate suffering that had been detailed. By stating that "no changes will be made to PIP until the review concludes in Autumn 2026," Davies inadvertently confirmed a troubling status quo, offering little comfort to those struggling today.

Shaun Davies' response exemplifies a failure of political engagement. It prioritises the defence of a system over the urgent needs of constituents. The impersonal nature of the reply, coupled with its avoidance of the invitation's subject, underscores a significant gap between political rhetoric and the meaningful action required for disability equality. As the Labour Party grapples with its identity and lack of commitment to social justice, it is crucial for representatives like Davies to listen and engage authentically with the voices of those they serve. 

Over 38,000 disabled people, and their families deserve better than this. 


SCOPE Price Tag Report 2025
Disability Price Tag 2025 | Disability charity Scope UK https://share.google/DPFcgA9Iy6WP4FW3Q


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Farage's Cruelty-Autism

Farage's Cruelty & Misinformation on Autism: A Call for Compassion and Truth in Autism Awareness Month - by Mark Webster, Disability Officer with The Green Party Telford and Wrekin  As Autism Awareness and Acceptance Month 2025 draws to a close,  the need for understanding, compassion, and factual discussion about autism and the SEND (Special Educational Needs and Disabilities) system has never been more urgent. Yet, Nigel Farage and Reform UK have chosen this crucial moment to spread harmful and inaccurate narratives about autism diagnosis, compounding stigma and misunderstanding for autistic people and their families across the UK. SEND (Special Educational Needs and Disabilities) is a blanket term that refers to conditions or difficulties that make it hard for a person to learn or access education compared to others, such as learning disabilities, physical disabilities, or emotional and behavioral challenges.  Farage’s Harmful Claims In a series of recent statemen...
Post a Comment
Read more

A Wolf in Reformist Clothing

A Wolf in Reformist Clothing: Dissecting the Structural Ableism of Reform UK's SEND "Vision" As a Green Party Disability Officer with three decades of experience, and as a parent who has spent 15 years battling intransigent local authorities for my neurodivergent son, and others, I watched Richard Tice’s press statement with a familiar, corrosive fury. This is not a blueprint for reform. It is a masterclass in the very structural ableism and neoliberal betrayal that has manufactured the SEND crisis. So come with me, and let’s dissect it with the critical eye that it demands. The Insidious Linguistics of Erasure Tice with his core creed: “Nobody's disabled, people are differently abled.” This phrase is not progressive; it is erasure. It is a feel-good, ablest euphemism designed to sanitise the reality of disability in a society structured against us. Disability is not a matter of “different ability”; it is an interaction between impairment and t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Hidden Cost of Caring

Hidden Costs Why Our Family Carers Deserve Better Imagine waking up every day knowing that your entire world revolves around caring for a loved one with disabilities. You’re doing everything you can to keep them safe, comfortable, and loved — often at great personal cost.  Now, consider this: nearly half of parent carers in the UK say their income doesn’t even cover basic needs like food and housing. That’s almost 44%. And if your fridge breaks or your bed falls apart? Over 80% of carers say they couldn’t replace essentials without going into debt or going without. It’s heartbreaking, isn’t it? And yet, these are the everyday realities for millions of families. Many are skipping meals just to make sure their children eat, with over half of parent carers doing so.  Meanwhile, a staggering 93% of families want to work paid jobs, but caring responsibilities make that practically impossible. The emotional toll is equally heavy, with 28% of parent carers likely to be clinically dep...
Post a Comment
Read more