Skip to main content

Left Behind: How Telford & Wrekin’s Council Tax Changes Are Failing Disabled Residents

Left Behind:

How Telford &

Wrekin’s Council

Tax Changes Are

Failing Disabled

Residents

In 2020/21 the local council under then leader and now MP, Shaun Davies, and current leader, then Cabinet Member for Finance Cllr Lee Carter, introduced a new plan for how much people pay in council tax, especially for those on low incomes or with disabilities. 

This plan called for a major overhaul to the Council Tax Reduction Scheme.While it aimed to save money and make things fair, many worried that it might actually make life harder for disabled people. 

5 years on, we can say for sure that has!

What Changed?

Under the old rules, disabled people who received certain benefits could get up to 100% discount on their council tax. But now, the council says that disabled people can only get up to a 90% discount. That might not sound like much, but it means they are now using money for disability aids and services for paying tax.

However, there is an even bigger problem. The most severley disabled do not qualify for the 90% help! 

The government tops up disabled peoples income through Universal Credit (UC) with a health element, which closes the gap between DLA/PIP money, which actually falls short of providing for disabled peoples needs, and the actual costs of living with a disability, as identified by this SCOPE survey

Telford and Wrekin Council now take that income in to consideration for council tax. For those with the most severe disabilities, this means that they qualify for zero help!

This means some disabled people have found it harder to pay their council tax now, and are forced to go without essential disability aids and services. They face more financial stress, which is leading to debt, risking them even losing their homes if they can't keep up. 

The council’s 2020/21 plan talked of a hardship fund, which is like a safety net, but it didn't say about how well that safety net would work or whether everyone knew about it, and it turns out that it is more of a PR exercise than a safety net.

What Was Missing in the Assessment?

The council’s report tried to explain what might happen, but it failed to really look into the real impact on disabled folks. For example:

It didn't tell us how people with severe disabilities would be affected. Was this by design because they knew the most severely disabled would no longer qualify for help?

It didn't explain whether those with different kinds of disabilities would find it harder to get help. Like those who are neurodivergent, or physically disabled, both substantially confused and physically drained by form filling.

It didn't say if disabled people would struggle more because of these changes.

Is The Help Enough?

The council mentions the hardship fund, but it’s now clear it’s not enough to support everyone who needs help, and again the bar is set so that those most severley disabled people do not qualify for help! 

How Do They Keep Track?

The council said they would check how the new scheme is working over time. But they didn't say exactly how they would make sure disabled people were not being unfairly hurt. 

The Green Party of Telford and Wrekin has been watching these changes closely and listening to disabled communities to see what’s really happening.

Changing the council tax scheme might have saved a few pennies, but it’s important to think about how these changes affected the most vulnerable, especially disabled people, who now go without essentials.

We need to make sure that disabled people are not left behind. The council should listen more to those affected, provide clear information, and make sure genuine help is available when needed. 

These changes are making life harder for those who already face many tough challenges. 

Telford and Wrekin really does deserve better

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Wolf in Reformist Clothing

A Wolf in Reformist Clothing: Dissecting the Structural Ableism of Reform UK's SEND "Vision" As a Green Party Disability Officer with three decades of experience, and as a parent who has spent 15 years battling intransigent local authorities for my neurodivergent son, and others, I watched Richard Tice’s press statement with a familiar, corrosive fury. This is not a blueprint for reform. It is a masterclass in the very structural ableism and neoliberal betrayal that has manufactured the SEND crisis. So come with me, and let’s dissect it with the critical eye that it demands. The Insidious Linguistics of Erasure Tice with his core creed: “Nobody's disabled, people are differently abled.” This phrase is not progressive; it is erasure. It is a feel-good, ablest euphemism designed to sanitise the reality of disability in a society structured against us. Disability is not a matter of “different ability”; it is an interaction between impairment and t...

Farage's Cruelty-Autism

Farage's Cruelty & Misinformation on Autism: A Call for Compassion and Truth in Autism Awareness Month - by Mark Webster, Disability Officer with The Green Party Telford and Wrekin  As Autism Awareness and Acceptance Month 2025 draws to a close,  the need for understanding, compassion, and factual discussion about autism and the SEND (Special Educational Needs and Disabilities) system has never been more urgent. Yet, Nigel Farage and Reform UK have chosen this crucial moment to spread harmful and inaccurate narratives about autism diagnosis, compounding stigma and misunderstanding for autistic people and their families across the UK. SEND (Special Educational Needs and Disabilities) is a blanket term that refers to conditions or difficulties that make it hard for a person to learn or access education compared to others, such as learning disabilities, physical disabilities, or emotional and behavioral challenges.  Farage’s Harmful Claims In a series of recent statemen...

LibDem Conference 2025

Following last week's observations of the Reform UK Ltd conference, I had hoped that there would be nothing to report from the Liberal Democrats conference as far as disability is concerned. How wrong was I? While at the conference their leader, Sir Ed Davey, stocked the fires of the hostile environment towards the sick and disabled, using tired old tropes and unsupported figures! See video For istance, Sir Ed, sounding very right wing himself, regurgitated the "fact" that there is widespread fraud by those claiming PIP (Personal Independence Payments) while talking with a radio broadcaster see video While fraud has seen an increase, from 0.0% to 0.4% which is approximately £1.2 billion, and is born out by the governments own 2025 figures. To put that in context, the welfare bill is £303.3 billion per year. Further comparison shows that tax fraud in the UK figures were £48.8 billion a year, and known tax evasion was £0.7 billion. So it would take a person on a...