Skip to main content

Reeves Speech Conference 2025

An Invisible Workforce 
How Labour’s “Working People” Rhetoric Erases Disabled Voters

If you did see Chancellor Rachel Reeves’ keynote speech at the Labour conference in Liverpool, you’d be forgiven for thinking Britain runs on a very specific type of person. 

The words “working people,” “working class families,” and “hardworking people” were repeated a staggering 34 times.

But for a significant part of the population, the speech wasn't just repetitive—it was a slap in the face. Not once did the Chancellor mention accessible work for disabled adults or young people. Not a single reference to reasonable adjustments. No plan for those with fluctuating conditions, mobility barriers, or neurodivergence.

In short, it was an act of erasure.

Instead, we got productivity rhetoric and a Youth Guarantee scheme that, frankly, sends a chill down the spine. The scheme threatens benefit sanctions for those who “refuse” work placements, with no apparent regard for how disability might make such a placement impossible. This isn’t an oversight; it’s a policy. When a government talks about work but systematically excludes disabled people from the conversation, it’s not neglect—it’s a choice.

And what a bitter, unforgivable choice it is.

The real kicker? Disabled people and their families are the very group that helped put this government in power. Labour’s 2024 election victory was significantly bolstered by support from disabled voters, many living in the party’s heartlands. Places like Telford were crucial to their success. Now, those same voters are watching as their new government, which they trusted to fix a broken system, immediately starts drawing lines that leave them outside.

This puts local MPs like Telford’s Shaun Davies in a glaring spotlight. Despite eloquent lobbying from his own constituents, backed by damning evidence from the likes of Amnesty International and the UN, Davies has categorically backed his government’s policy over the needs of the town's disabled population.

He might want to check the recent polls. A YouGov survey from June 2025 already shows a notable defection of voters from Labour, with dissatisfaction running high among those who feel betrayed on key issues. The message is clear: the loyalty of disabled voters and their families is not a given.

So, we’re left with a painful question for Mr. Davies: will losing his seat because he failed to stand up for the disabled people, families, and carers of Telford be worth his lofty promotion to an unpaid bag carrier? Will he go down in history as Telford's first single-term MP? Even the awful Conservative Lucy Allen managed three terms.

We deserve better than being invisible in speeches and punished in practice. If Labour’s vision of “hard work” doesn’t include us, then it’s not a vision—it’s a warning. And it’s one that voters will not forget.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Wolf in Reformist Clothing

A Wolf in Reformist Clothing: Dissecting the Structural Ableism of Reform UK's SEND "Vision" As a Green Party Disability Officer with three decades of experience, and as a parent who has spent 15 years battling intransigent local authorities for my neurodivergent son, and others, I watched Richard Tice’s press statement with a familiar, corrosive fury. This is not a blueprint for reform. It is a masterclass in the very structural ableism and neoliberal betrayal that has manufactured the SEND crisis. So come with me, and let’s dissect it with the critical eye that it demands. The Insidious Linguistics of Erasure Tice with his core creed: “Nobody's disabled, people are differently abled.” This phrase is not progressive; it is erasure. It is a feel-good, ablest euphemism designed to sanitise the reality of disability in a society structured against us. Disability is not a matter of “different ability”; it is an interaction between impairment and t...

Farage's Cruelty-Autism

Farage's Cruelty & Misinformation on Autism: A Call for Compassion and Truth in Autism Awareness Month - by Mark Webster, Disability Officer with The Green Party Telford and Wrekin  As Autism Awareness and Acceptance Month 2025 draws to a close,  the need for understanding, compassion, and factual discussion about autism and the SEND (Special Educational Needs and Disabilities) system has never been more urgent. Yet, Nigel Farage and Reform UK have chosen this crucial moment to spread harmful and inaccurate narratives about autism diagnosis, compounding stigma and misunderstanding for autistic people and their families across the UK. SEND (Special Educational Needs and Disabilities) is a blanket term that refers to conditions or difficulties that make it hard for a person to learn or access education compared to others, such as learning disabilities, physical disabilities, or emotional and behavioral challenges.  Farage’s Harmful Claims In a series of recent statemen...

LibDem Conference 2025

Following last week's observations of the Reform UK Ltd conference, I had hoped that there would be nothing to report from the Liberal Democrats conference as far as disability is concerned. How wrong was I? While at the conference their leader, Sir Ed Davey, stocked the fires of the hostile environment towards the sick and disabled, using tired old tropes and unsupported figures! See video For istance, Sir Ed, sounding very right wing himself, regurgitated the "fact" that there is widespread fraud by those claiming PIP (Personal Independence Payments) while talking with a radio broadcaster see video While fraud has seen an increase, from 0.0% to 0.4% which is approximately £1.2 billion, and is born out by the governments own 2025 figures. To put that in context, the welfare bill is £303.3 billion per year. Further comparison shows that tax fraud in the UK figures were £48.8 billion a year, and known tax evasion was £0.7 billion. So it would take a person on a...