Skip to main content

Telford's High-Stakes Gamble

Telford's High-Stakes Gamble: Our Council is Betting Our Future on the Property Market!

Let’s talk about our money. Specifically, let's talk about Telford and Wrekin Council's finances. On the surface, the story is a political dream. The council boasts 16 years of balanced budgets, low council tax, and a knack for winning government grants. They’ve managed to navigate over £180 million in government cuts since 2010. It sounds like a miracle of financial management, right?

But when you pull back the curtain, a much riskier and more concerning picture emerges. Our council isn’t just collecting bins and fixing potholes anymore; it’s behaving like a high-stakes property speculator.

The Property Gambler

The cornerstone of the council’s financial “resilience” is its commercial property portfolio. Through its ‘Grade Fund’ and ‘Nu Place’ investments, the council generates over £12 million a year. This money is used to plug gaps in services and keep our council tax bills down.

But here’s the problem: this isn't a safe, boring savings account. This is the council borrowing huge sums—it’s authorised to borrow up to £665 million—to bet on the volatile commercial property market. Think shopping centres and business parks.

What happens if there’s a major economic downturn, if remote work permanently reduces demand for office space, or if interest rates rise further? These income-generating assets could swiftly become massive liabilities. We’re not talking about a small loss; we’re talking about a gamble with public money on a scale that could threaten the very services it’s meant to protect.

The Illusion of Balance

Then there’s the “balanced budget” itself. This year, the council faced a shocking £11.3 million overspend, almost entirely driven by the crisis in Adult Social Care. This isn’t a one-off; it’s a sign of a system buckling under immense pressure.

How did they “balance” it? Not with a long-term solution, but by using emergency contingencies and finding quick savings. It’s the financial equivalent of putting a plaster on a broken leg. With over half of its budget now consumed by social care, this juggling act is becoming more dangerous every year. The core function of caring for our elderly and vulnerable is pushing the entire system to the brink.

A Stealth Tax on the Most Vulnerable

Even the council’s new plan to manage Houses of Multiple Occupation (HMOs) reveals a flawed financial logic. The scheme will be funded by charging landlords a £1,500+ licence fee. But let’s be real—landlords are businesses, not charities. This cost will be passed straight on to tenants in higher rents.

So, the council is effectively funding a public protection service through a stealth tax on some of the borough's lowest-income renters. It’s a policy that claims to help vulnerable people while making their lives more expensive.

In short, our council’s survival strategy is a high-wire act. It’s balanced for now, but it’s dependent on property markets staying strong and on continuing to fund essential services with what is essentially gambling revenue. It’s a damning indictment of a decade of national austerity, but that doesn’t make it a safe plan for our future.


A Better Way: Building a Telford That’s Wealthy, Healthy and Resilient

So, if the current path is so risky, what’s the alternative? It’s time to stop just managing the decline and start building a genuinely resilient local economy. Imagine a council that doesn’t just follow the market, but shapes it for the public good.

This alternative isn’t a fantasy; it’s based on proven models from forward-thinking councils across the UK.

1. Invest in Our Homes, Not Just Office Blocks

Instead of gambling on commercial property, the council should use its borrowing power to launch a borough-wide, council-led home insulation and solar power programme.

· How it works: The council finances the retrofitting of thousands of homes with proper insulation and solar panels.
· The payoff: This creates hundreds of skilled local jobs, slashes everyone’s fuel bills (tackling the cost-of-living crisis head-on), and drastically reduces our carbon footprint. The council gets a return on its investment through energy savings and selling power back to the grid—a "Green Dividend" for everyone. This is public finance for public good.

2. Build and Own Our Affordable Housing

Instead of taxing tenants in substandard HMOs, let’s drown the rogue landlords out with quality.

· How it works: The council should expedite the use of its powers to bring empty homes back into use and directly commission the building of beautiful, eco-friendly, affordable homes on its own land.
· The payoff: This creates a public-owned housing stock that generates stable, long-term income for the council while providing secure, warm, and affordable homes for residents. It builds community assets, not private profit.

3. Create a "Community Care" Economy

We can’t just keep throwing money at the social care crisis. We need to prevent it.

· How it works: The council can commission care services from local, not-for-profit cooperatives (owned by the staff and users), keeping money and jobs in Telford. Simultaneously, invest in community hubs, social clubs, and lunch clubs. These aren’t luxuries; they are vital infrastructure that combat loneliness and keep people healthy and independent for longer.
· The payoff: A happier, healthier community and lower long-term demand for expensive crisis care. It’s smarter spending.

A Council That Works With Us

This new approach requires a new kind of politics: one that is more transparent and democratic. Imagine having a direct say in how a portion of the budget is spent through Participatory Budgeting. Imagine a "Council Tax Justice Statement" that clearly shows where our money goes and makes the powerful case to Westminster for a fairer funding deal.

This isn't just better accounting. It’s a different vision for Telford and Wrekin—one where the council is a bold market-shaper, not a desperate market-follower. The goal isn’t just a technically balanced budget, but a borough that is genuinely more wealthy, healthy, and resilient for all of us. It’s a future worth building.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Wolf in Reformist Clothing

A Wolf in Reformist Clothing: Dissecting the Structural Ableism of Reform UK's SEND "Vision" As a Green Party Disability Officer with three decades of experience, and as a parent who has spent 15 years battling intransigent local authorities for my neurodivergent son, and others, I watched Richard Tice’s press statement with a familiar, corrosive fury. This is not a blueprint for reform. It is a masterclass in the very structural ableism and neoliberal betrayal that has manufactured the SEND crisis. So come with me, and let’s dissect it with the critical eye that it demands. The Insidious Linguistics of Erasure Tice with his core creed: “Nobody's disabled, people are differently abled.” This phrase is not progressive; it is erasure. It is a feel-good, ablest euphemism designed to sanitise the reality of disability in a society structured against us. Disability is not a matter of “different ability”; it is an interaction between impairment and t...

Farage's Cruelty-Autism

Farage's Cruelty & Misinformation on Autism: A Call for Compassion and Truth in Autism Awareness Month - by Mark Webster, Disability Officer with The Green Party Telford and Wrekin  As Autism Awareness and Acceptance Month 2025 draws to a close,  the need for understanding, compassion, and factual discussion about autism and the SEND (Special Educational Needs and Disabilities) system has never been more urgent. Yet, Nigel Farage and Reform UK have chosen this crucial moment to spread harmful and inaccurate narratives about autism diagnosis, compounding stigma and misunderstanding for autistic people and their families across the UK. SEND (Special Educational Needs and Disabilities) is a blanket term that refers to conditions or difficulties that make it hard for a person to learn or access education compared to others, such as learning disabilities, physical disabilities, or emotional and behavioral challenges.  Farage’s Harmful Claims In a series of recent statemen...

LibDem Conference 2025

Following last week's observations of the Reform UK Ltd conference, I had hoped that there would be nothing to report from the Liberal Democrats conference as far as disability is concerned. How wrong was I? While at the conference their leader, Sir Ed Davey, stocked the fires of the hostile environment towards the sick and disabled, using tired old tropes and unsupported figures! See video For istance, Sir Ed, sounding very right wing himself, regurgitated the "fact" that there is widespread fraud by those claiming PIP (Personal Independence Payments) while talking with a radio broadcaster see video While fraud has seen an increase, from 0.0% to 0.4% which is approximately £1.2 billion, and is born out by the governments own 2025 figures. To put that in context, the welfare bill is £303.3 billion per year. Further comparison shows that tax fraud in the UK figures were £48.8 billion a year, and known tax evasion was £0.7 billion. So it would take a person on a...